中医药研究论丛

211.12 WHO 针灸经穴定位国际标准化之反思
TJ TCM.21(1) : 139-154, 2018
WHO 针灸经穴定位国际标准化之反思
The Reflection of WHO Standard Acupuncture Point Locations
陈必诚1* 黄廷宇1
1 中国医药大学学士後中医系,台中,台湾
【摘要】
中医针灸为人类非物质文化遗产之一,临床上针灸也不断的证明了其有效性,世界卫生组织(WHO) 2008 年订定出ㄧ套世界通用的经络穴位系统,这套经络穴位系统将各穴位的体表取穴位置(2D)、所属经络、与相关的解剖构造都给予了明确的标准,这些成就也反应在当今许多的教科书上,提供後学在经络与穴位学习上明确的教材,并且使中医针灸可以更有效的在国际间进行沟通。然而,2D 的位置并不足以提供完整的取穴资讯,故本文中我们透过文献的探讨来反思目前针灸标准化的得失与未来可以更加进步的方向。我们发现历史上与取穴相关文献不只记载了穴道的2D 位置,而是如《针灸甲乙经》、《针灸大成》中也同时记载了针刺深度、下针前患者的姿态等更精细的资讯,明代的高武更是注意到了男、女及儿童穴位有所差别,因而分别铸造了三种针灸铜人模型来做为取穴上的叁考,另外,穴道亦非只能归属ㄧ条经络,而可能是同时归属多条经的「会穴」,这些经验都明示着针灸取穴上该更加精准的方向。总之,从文献中可发现当今的标准化仍可朝以下四个方向加强:1. 穴道归经的重审;2. 穴道深度的附加;3. 取穴时患者的摆位与动作;4. / 女、长/ 幼之不同。
【关键词】针灸、针灸甲乙经、WHO、穴位标准化
Bih-Cheng Chen1* Ting-Yu Huang1
1School of Post-Baccalaureate Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
【Summary】
Acupuncture is one of the intangible cultural heritage of mankind which has been proved for its clinical effectiveness. In 2008, World Health Organization (WHO) had stipulated a standardized system of meridians and acupuncture points that can be used universally. This system has provided a precise standard on the acupuncture point locations (2-dimentional), the respective meridians and the related anatomical structures. These achievements are also reflected in the many current textbooks to provide explicit teaching materials of the meridians and acupuncture points for the new learners. In addition, it has provided an effective communication internationally among the Chinese Medicine Practitioners. However, the 2D illustrations are insufficient to provide a complete information of acupuncture point locations. In this study, we explore the pros and cons of the standardization of the acupuncture point locations and the possible future improvement through literature review. We have discovered that historically, the related literatures on acupuncture points location not only recorded the 2D illustrations. The early acupuncture publications such as Zhen jiu jia yi jing [The Systematized Canon of Acupuncture and Moxibustion] and Zhen jiu da cheng [The Great Compendium of Acupuncture and Moxibustion] had also recorded detailed information eg the needling depth, the arrangement of the patient’s posture before the treatment etc. In Ming Dynasty, the physician Gao Wu had also observed the difference in the acupuncture point locations among the male, female and children. Hence, he had cast three acupuncture bronze models to illustrate the acupuncture point locations as a reference. In addition, one acupuncture point may not just belong to one meridian, it can also be a “Meridian Hui-meeting point” which belongs to multiple meridians. These considerations have clearly shown how acupuncture point locations can be more accurately defined. All in all, ancient literature points to four directions along which standardization could be refined: 1. To re-examine which meridian each acupuncture point belongs to; 2. Addition of the depth of acupuncture points; 3. Consideration of the patient’s posture and action while locating acupuncture points; 4. Differences between the sexes andage while locating acupuncture points.
 
KeywordsAcupuncture, Zhen-jiu-jia-yi-jing, (The Systematized Canon of Acupuncture and Moxibustion) WHO, Acupuncture Point Locations Standardization